Local (303) 454-8000
Toll Free (800) ROSEN-911
Se Habla Español
Contact Me For a Free Consultation

Do Drugged Driving Laws Hurt Medical Marijuana Users?

| (Google+)

The White House has issued a call for every state to make strict drugged driving legislation a priority. What makes this complicated, however, is that for most illicit drugs, including marijuana, there’s no agreed-upon limit that reliably determines impairment.

Drugged Driving (DUID) and Medical Marijuana Laws Across the U.S.

This map shows drugged driving laws by state, as well as which states allow medical marijuana. CLICK TO ENLARGE.

There are currently 18 jurisdictions (17 states plus the District of Columbia) that allow the use of marijuana for medicinal purposes, and over a million medical marijuana patients across the country. With three different types of drugged driving laws across the U.S. — and varying state limits for determining impairment from marijuana — depending on which type of law a state uses, a person who is legally allowed to use medical marijuana can be convicted of driving while impaired, even if he or she did not use medical pot on the same day.

This is because THC — the main psychoactive element of marijuana (that causes a person to get high) — can be present in the blood of a heavy pot user for several hours or even days, long after any impairing effects of the drug have gone away. And THC-COOH — a secondary metabolite in marijuana that is formed after a person gets high, and that has no psychoactive effect — is detectable in urine for weeks or even months after past use.

DUID Laws in the United States

There are three types of DUID (driving under the influence of drugs) laws in the U.S.:
, Per Se, and Zero Tolerance.

1) Effect-Based DUID Laws
Used in 38 states, these laws forbid drivers to operate a motor vehicle when they are either “under the influence” of a controlled substance or if an illegal drug prevents them from driving safely. To convict a driver under an effect-based law, a prosecutor needs to prove that the driver’s impairment or incapacity was directly related to the illicit substance. Prosecutors rely on the evidence that law enforcement officers gather at an accident scene, such as how a driver performs in a field sobriety test, information that a driver was exceeding the speed limit, testimony from a Drug Recognition Expert (DRE), and positive results on toxicological tests showing recent consumption of an illegal drug. (One of these states is Washington, but if that state’s Initiative 502 is passed, Washington will have a Per Se limit of 5ng per ml for people 21 and over, and Zero Tolerance for anyone under 21, according to Troy Barber of Sensible Washington.)

2) Per Se DUID Laws
These laws are used by four states: Nevada (which has legalized medical marijuana), Montana, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. These prohibit drivers from operating a motor vehicle if they have more than a certain level of drugs or drug metabolites in their system. But unlike laws regulating how much alcohol can be in a driver’s system (usually .08% constitutes a basis for a driving-while-intoxicated arrest), there are often no set limits for Per Se DUID laws. This is because, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation via NORML:

Forensic toxicologists generally have failed to agree on specific [per se levels] that could be designated as evidence of impairment. The lack of consensus about per se levels of drugs where impairment could be deemed makes it difficult to identify, prosecute or convict drugged drivers in most states.[3]

3) Zero Tolerance Per Se Laws
In response to researchers’ failure to define exact Per Se limits for illicit drugs, some states have enacted Zero Tolerance Per Se laws. Zero Tolerance Per Se laws related to marijuana are in use in 10 states: Arizona and Michigan (both of which have legalized medical marijuana), Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, South Dakota, and Utah (although two of those — Arizona and Delaware  — exclude medical marijuana patients from the statute). In their strictest form, these zero tolerance laws forbid drivers from operating a motor vehicle if they have any detectable level at all of an illicit drug or drug metabolite in their bodily fluids.

The Problem With Zero Tolerance DUID Laws

Currently, there are 10 states that enforce zero tolerance DUID laws. On the surface, this may seem like a reasonable policy: If you have pot in your system, you shouldn’t be behind the wheel of a vehicle. However, zero tolerance laws can create problems for regular users of medical marijuana because THC and THC-COOH can linger in a person’s blood long after he or she has used the drug. Thus, a person who smokes medical marijuana on one day, could be arrested for a DUID several days (or even weeks) later, even though he or she is completely sober at the time of operating the vehicle.

As Paul Armentano, Deputy Director of  NORML, writes in the article “You Are Going Directly To Jail: What It Means, Who’s Behind It, and Strategies to Prevent It”:

Though billed[1] by its proponents as a necessary tool to crack down on persons who operate a motor vehicle while impaired by illicit drugs, in reality, many newly proposed DUID [driving under the influence of drugs] laws — in particular ‘zero tolerance’ per se laws — have little to do with promoting public safety or identifying motorists who drive while intoxicated. Rather, these laws potentially classify many sober drivers as impaired under the law solely because they were presumed to have consumed a controlled substance — particularly marijuana — at some previous, unspecified point in time.


  • The U.S. Department of Justice affirms that a positive drug test result for the presence of a drug metabolite does not necessarily indicate “recency, frequency, or amount of use; or impairment.”[9]
  • And a U.S. Department of Transportation report says that although a positive test for drug metabolites is “solid proof of drug use within the last few days, it cannot be used by itself to prove behavioral impairment during a focal event.”[10]

The following chart shows the state limits for THC-COOH in the blood for the four zero-tolerance states and nine per se states. It also displays the typical amount of THC-COOH that will remain in the blood of light to heavy users of marijuana after 20 days without using the drug.

Medical Marijuana THC-COOH State Limits for Impairment

This chart shows varying state limits for THC-COOH in a driver’s blood; and the amount of THC-COOH that typically remains in the blood of light to heavy medical marijuana users 20 days after last use. CLICK TO ENLARGE.

As you can see, even without using marijuana for as many as 20 days, heavy users of medical marijuana would still be over the legal limit to drive in all 13 states; and light to moderate users of marijuana would be over the limit in all of these states except for Ohio.

Drugged driving is a serious problem nationwide. The NHTSA has found that more than 11% of nighttime weekend drivers test positive for illicit drug use. While the U.S. clearly needs legislation to deter this widespread and destructive behavior, many states have enacted DUID laws that can affect sober, law-abiding drivers. With medical marijuana use on the rise, America’s lawmakers need to be careful about where they set the bar.


8 Responses to “Do Drugged Driving Laws Hurt Medical Marijuana Users?”

  • Deana Carol says:

    Very well written article……………many good points………thanks for the info.

  • Marc says:

    This is a very informative piece and sort of scary in the current political climate. Any person legitimately prescribed Medical Marijuana is in considerable danger under these circumstances.

  • Doreen Dupont says:

    You explained it pretty well. Urine or blood levels of THC do not necessarily coordinate with impairment, I think if a person fails a coordination field test, and there is any evidence of THC usage on blood or urine, that should be the standard for driving while impaired or under the influence of THC. And it follows that medical marijuana users should not be driving. It is well known that THC impairs coordination. Now that should curtail abuse of medical marijuana. Maybe the law should be…driving with impaired coordination in a documented user of medical marijuana.

  • Ken Kaplan says:

    Well of course these laws are going to hinder medical marijuana users. Zero tolerance laws are ridiculous on their face. Each of the other 2 approaches has problems. Perhaps the best approach would be a combination of the those 2, namely some threshold of THC in your system, combined with a field sobriety test. The issue is impairment, not mere use. Unless you establish per se regulations for every drug in the PDR, why pick on marijuana? And why discriminate between medical users and recreational users? If you are not impaired, you aren’t a danger to others and shouldn’t be penalized, and if you are impaired, whether or not you have a prescription is irrelevant.

  • Good article, but why no mention of the scientific trials in the U.K. and Canada which have shown people under the influence of cannabis to actually be safer than SOBER drivers! Obviously, many people will be skeptical of such claims; but shouldn’t we base these decisions on facts instead of irrational fears? Caffeine helps people stay awake, but also contributes to feelings of “road rage” and causes lots of hasty decisions that result in accidents… People using Adderall, Ritalin and a host of other pharmaceuticals are legally under the influence of amphetamines and/or opiates… Medical cannabis users deserve a level playing field, where actual impairment is the determining factor of legality. Easily dis-proven stereotypes have no place in our government, whatsoever.

  • Debbie says:

    Very informative article. Also very well-written. The police crack down on drunk drivers, but not drugged drivers, which could even be worse.

  • Vincent says:

    Enjoy it whilst you can. All states will probably soon be zero tolerance. Without our ‘legal’ system how could America’s biggest industry thrive and expand? Incarceration is the best business in this country! And rapidly expanding – get in on the ground floor – buy stocks now!

  • […] others are concerned about the effect legalization will have on driving safety and the rate of drugged driving. Fender reports that “the state is closer than ever to defining just how stoned is too stoned […]


My daughter and I first consulted with Dan Rosen after a very serious auto accident. Dan had several phone conferences with me, and Tracie was available whenever I called. We would recommend personal injury attorney Dan Rosen to anyone!
Sally from Denver, Colorado

Law Offices of Daniel R. Rosen

1400 16th Street #400, Denver, CO 80202
Open M-F 9am to 5pm.
(303) 454-8000 | Contact Us

Don't live in Denver?

We also have offices in Englewood, Colorado Springs and Greeley.
Embed this infographic:
Embed this image: